Kinematics:


Till yesterday, I thought these problems were difficult:

Find 'x' so that the 2 particles collide.

22 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Is the answer approximately 14.05m?

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. try not to use equations of motion for this question.

    ReplyDelete
  5. oh yes bhaiya u r right these type of problems r really easy.

    ReplyDelete
  6. relative velocity is the trick.

    ReplyDelete
  7. sorry, a calculation error,
    X=7(24+13√(3))/23 =14.15m ?
    using relative velocity, it reduces to a simple trigonometry problem.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think we have a correct answer... try this too:

    In a 3D space without gravity, two particles are located at positions r1(vector) and r2(vector) respectively. They are moving with velocities v1(vector) and v2(vector) respectively.

    Write the condition for their collision.

    ReplyDelete
  9. not sure about this one, but is it
    (v2-v1)x(r2-r1)=0 ?

    ReplyDelete
  10. [(r2)x-(r1)x]/[(v1)x-(v2)x]=[(r2)y-(r1)y]/[(v1)y-(v2)y]>0 ?

    ReplyDelete
  11. @shourya: Its correct.

    @Mayank: I think its wrong (what are x and y btw)

    @All: Try the 2nd problem. Its better than the 1st one.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  13. x and y represent the x-component and y-component respectively.

    ReplyDelete
  14. i think it should be (r1-r2).(v1-v2)>0

    ReplyDelete
  15. @Mayank: what about the z component?
    @Shivam: I'm quite sure (v2-v1)X(r2-r1)=0 is correct.
    @Shourya: Though there's a significant flaw in your answer too.

    Note that X denotes the vector cross product.

    ReplyDelete
  16. If z component is taken into account,then would
    [(r2)x-(r1)x]/[(v1)x-(v2)x]=[(r2)y-(r1)y]/[(v1)y-(v2)y]=[(r2)z-(r1)z]/[(v1)z-(v2)z]>0
    have been correct?

    ReplyDelete
  17. i know bhaiya the particles might never collide!!!
    thats why i was uncertain the first time.
    i think it should be (v2-v1)=k(r2-r1);k<0.

    ReplyDelete
  18. oh yes bahiya u r right their seperation and the velocity of approach have to be in same direction

    ReplyDelete
  19. I think Shourya's second post completes the answer, the velocity and the position must be antiparallel

    ReplyDelete
  20. (v2-v1)x(r2-r1)=0
    (r1-r2).(v1-v2)>0


    combining these two will make complete answer

    ReplyDelete