Electrostatic Experience


In a 3-D space, the potential depends only on 'x' and is given by V(x,y,z)=-2*x^n. In other words, the potential is proportional to the nth power of the x coordinate.

In this case, find P(x,y,z), where 'P' stands for the volume charge density.

Click here for the solution

32 comments:

  1. is the charge density -8*pi*epsilon*n*(x^n)/yz ?

    ReplyDelete
  2. -n*x ki power(n-2)*epsilon

    ReplyDelete
  3. -4 epsilon n^2 x^(n-2)

    ReplyDelete
  4. The ans. has to be -2n(n-1)є x^(n-2)

    ReplyDelete
  5. please don't post the solutions/approach yet.

    @sambhav: could you point out which of these answers is correct?

    ReplyDelete
  6. to be precise, none

    I think people didn't notice a minus already in the potential function

    ReplyDelete
  7. I too missed the minus sign in the potential function..:-(
    the correct answer should be 2n(n-1)εx^(n-2)

    ReplyDelete
  8. What happened to the 'solutions on the way'?
    Someone please post the solution or just comment if Mayank's answer is correct..

    ReplyDelete
  9. yes, Anonymous, Mayank's answer is correct. I was waiting for more replies, I hope i have the right to do that.

    btw, it would help us bloggers if you use some account to post comments, please don't post anonymously.

    Solution will be posted soon.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Lets try a simple variation:

    In a 3D space, the potential depends on the distance 'r' from the origin as:
    V(r)=a*r^2 + b*r +c (a quadratic variation).

    Find P(r).

    ReplyDelete
  11. is the answer -6aε ??to the variation .

    ReplyDelete
  12. i don't remember the differentiation of a particular class of integrals (which is what i used to use to solve these problems).

    so i can't post the correct answer. we'll wait for Sambhav.

    if possible, try to find the field corresponding to this charge distribution and see if its correct.

    ReplyDelete
  13. very well done Mayank, the 'variation' wasn't as easy!

    I'll try to post both the Mathematical solution, as well as the one using Gauss' Law soon :-)

    Rishabh, calc mistake, eh?

    ReplyDelete
  14. arre aap sab ne yeh answer position vector 'r' i terms mein kyon leave kar diya ..

    i resolved the position vector in three components and then solved to get -6aε........

    ReplyDelete
  15. firstly, 'r' here is not the position vector, it is the distance from origin.

    secondly, I solved this question by two methods, and writing 'r' as sqrt(x^2 + y^2 + z^2) is the mathematical solution i was talking about.

    ReplyDelete
  16. okay i took it as position vector ..

    had it been position vector then what would have been the answer ?

    plz reply .......

    ReplyDelete
  17. that does not make sense to me: it would be smth like:

    scalar(potential) = vector (a vector expression in 'r' vector)

    ReplyDelete
  18. arre mera matlab yeh nahi hai ..

    i assumed 'r' to be position vector in the expression of electric field and replaced it with x i cap +y j cap+z k cap. and then choose a differential cube of dimensions dx * dy * dz then find flux thru it and apply gauss law to get -6a epsilon as answer........

    where did i go wrong??????????

    ReplyDelete
  19. arey mere bhai, potential is a scalar, so ar^2 + br + c should also be a scalar, which cannot be if r is a vector

    and moreover, you can't square a vector, can you?

    ReplyDelete
  20. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  21. @ rajiv

    maine potential ke expression mein r ko vector nahi assume kiya . when u differentiate it u get 2ar+br which the expression of the electric field . in this expression i replaced r as x i cap + y j cap + z k cap (I CAN SURELY DO THIS AS ELECTRIC FIELD IS A VECTOR AND 'r' IS THE DISTANCE FROM THE ORIGIN i.e. IN VECTOR NOTATION I CAN WRITE IT AS MAGNITUDE OF POSITION VECTOR "r" ...................... )


    and for ur kind information square of a vector means its dot product with itself .......

    how can u forget such a simple concept ??????????????

    ReplyDelete
  22. No finger-pointing here please.
    @Abhishek: differentiation gives: 2ar+b. even here its not possible to consider 'r' a vector.

    Lets solve this anyway:
    Whats the charge distribution that produces a field:
    p(x`)+q(y`)+r(z`) (a vector field).

    x` means x cap.

    ReplyDelete
  23. WHY IT IS NOT possible to consider 'r'as a vector ?

    ReplyDelete
  24. is this a constant field bhaiya?? or were u talking about:
    px i + qy j + rz k??

    ReplyDelete
  25. how to solve this ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

    Lets solve this anyway:
    Whats the charge distribution that produces a field:
    p(x`)+q(y`)+r(z`) (a vector field).
    x` means x cap.

    ReplyDelete
  26. its a constant field. only infinite planes produce constant fields.

    so that answer will be an infinite plane whose orientation is perpendicular to p(x`)+q(y`)+r(z`)

    ReplyDelete