
This one is another easily confusible problem (maybe not for some of you).
A long flexible inextensible rope of uniform linear mass density 5 kg/m is being pulled on a rough floor, with a horizontal force F, in such a way that its lower part is at rest and upper part moves with a constant speed of 2 m/s.
What should be the magnitude of this force F ??
-Shivanker
hi
ReplyDeletehope ans is 5[2]^2
nope it ain't..
ReplyDeleteconfused !
ReplyDeletea very good question from a very good source. So, no need of me telling the answer as I already know it.
ReplyDelete10
ReplyDeleteyes, 10
ReplyDeleteshivanker and sambhav, I think that now judge should not be used. As Ankush pointed out that fault, I always confirm the answer from the page source and actually I see the answer and then try. I think now most of the students do this, so it would be better if you add answer on the judge after half day OR stop using it.
ReplyDeletethank you,
no. we'll keep the judge.
ReplyDeletethat's another thing you should learn: trying a problem even though solutions/answers are accessible.
i used
ReplyDeleteF=dp/dt= mdv/dt+ vdm/dt
now, dv/dt=0,
so F= v.dm/dt= vd[k.vt]/dt.....k = linear mass density
F=kv^2= 5[2]^2
pls help me
ReplyDeleteyes shaan even i did the same at first...but as a habit i try both newton's laws approach and work energy approach wherever possible, and they yielded different results here
ReplyDeletefor the given situation, F is probably not the only force acting, but certainly F is the only force doing work, so we know which approach is correct
(i might not be correct at this explanation, but surely answer is not 20)
the only other force[in horiizontal plane] i can think of is friction..
ReplyDeletebut then, it'll change the net force, as well as it'll dissipate some heat....
why do you say- "certainly F is the only force doing work"..
what kind of other F u talkin abt??
though i believe , friction ke baare mein naa sochein toh better hai.
there is no relative motion between rope and ground...(in crude words, rassi jameen se ghis nhi rhi), so, though friction is actingm, it aint doing any work
ReplyDeleteby F, i meant the given force F, the one which we need to calculate, it is not the only force as friction might also be acting, but F is the only force doing work, friction isn't
no work by friction=>no heat
makes perfect sense,
ReplyDeletethanks..
F=dp/dt
ReplyDeletedp = dm * v
F= 5*2 dt /dt=10
@Anonymous
ReplyDeleteF=vdm/dt, we put v=2, ok, what next?
how did you put dm/dt=5dt/dt?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletedm = dx * v * 5 kg/m
ReplyDeletedx= v dt
sorry
ReplyDeletedm = dx * 5 kg/m
dx= v dt
that's just what shaan was doing, there already has been a discussion on that, and that gives answer 20 not 10
ReplyDeletesorry again
ReplyDeletedx= .5 * v dt
tell me if i am correct
ReplyDeleteanonymous is perfectly correct..
ReplyDeletein time dt, only v.dt/2 part of the rope gains velocity v and not v.dt part
hence F = v.dm/dt = v*5*v/2 = 10
pls also tell how?
ReplyDeleteyes, we have to deal with the COM of the system so, though speed is 2m/s but, COM would be moving with only 1m/s. hence dm/dt=1*5=5
ReplyDeleteso, force=vdm/dt=10
to get a feel of this concept, use coordinate plane and analyse the of rate of change of COM. You will find it to 1m/s
ReplyDeletekya baat kar raha hai, mayank??
ReplyDeleteok let initially rope is on cartesian plan and one end be at origin and other at 10units. COM at 5 units. Now after 4sec, whole rope would be moving with 2m/s.But, COM will be at 15.So, net displacement is 10units in 4sec. dx/dt=2.5
ReplyDeleteHope it helps
no idea about what mayank has to say.. but here's what i meant..
ReplyDeletefirstly, we're applying newton's law only on the curled above part of the rope.. so F=v.dm/dt.. ok..
suppose now, that the free end being dragged by the force moves a length l units.. and we know, the part lying on the ground just below this dragged part is surely at rest.. then by constant string constraint.. dont we get that l/2 units of the rope is now curled above and moving with a velocity v, while the other l/2 is still lying on the ground??
now u may read my previous comment again..
strange !!!!! situation is same as that of the figure of previous post when k=0 and please tell the solution of resonance ques because i tried it a lot and getting answer 252
ReplyDelete