1)He heaves the boat forward (with great effort) providing it with 2 units speed.
2)Next, he sprints on the beach sand, and jumps into the boat (his running direction coincides with the boats motion), with a velocity 5 units.
What is the final speed of the boat??
is the answer 3?
ReplyDeleteif friction is not there between man and boat then, velocity of boat=2.
ReplyDeleteif sufficient friction that man stops relative to boat, then velocity of boat=3.
(I have also assumed liquid is non-viscous)
3 units
ReplyDeletebhaiya, please tell why viscosity wont have effect on the velocity, wouldn't it try to stop the boat.
ReplyDeleteyes same here ....3
ReplyDeleteOk bhaiya, I have realised my mistake, though my mistake can be true somewhere else. Here it might be that impulse by viscous force is negligible.
ReplyDeleteanswer is 3
ReplyDeleteit is too simple a question(ACC TO anuj bhaiya's level) for its answer to be 3.
ReplyDeletethough by simple thinkng, i also got 3.
but here , it is possible ki we might have to conserve momentum initially also when he pushes the boat, HENCE INITIAL SPEED OF BOAT = 2*300/200=3.
NOW , FINAL SPEED = 11/3
PLEASE CONFIRM..
yaar delhiite, i mean thik hai Anuj bhaiya asaan question nahi dete hai, but this doesnt mean u will think complex everytime
ReplyDeletequestion says HE HAS "PROVIDED" IT 2 units speed anyhow, so no use questioning that part
i also thnk ans is 3....
ReplyDeleteBut q says "providing it with 2 units speed" (1st point)....
In that case...mom will have to be conserved intially as well....
initially man nd boat both move with 2 m/s nd man comes to rest by applying force.....nw considering man + boat system boat's initial vel shall be 3 m/s....
'delhiite' might be correct here....
i think that the boat will have have speed 2 even after the man jumps on it as there is nothing givn abt fricton bw man n boat in the question.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAnswer is 3 units, by simple conservation of momentum. Forgive my language, if you thought the question was ambiguous. :P.
ReplyDelete